About the Journal

Focus and Scope:

The goal of IJRFB is to represent a massive understanding of Finance and Business studies to the next level of knowledge. IJRFB encourages academics to publish empirical and theoretical research publications in order to further their academic and professional development. Topics of interest for submission include but are not limited to:

  • Finance
  • Business
  • Economics Studies
  • Management
  • Accounting
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Social Science
  • Taxation
  • Financial risk
  • Public Administration
  • Economics Banking
  • Economics Development
  • Sharia Economics
  • Economics Sustainability
  • Corporate Governance
  • Project Management
  • Other related topics

Peer Review Process:

The process of reviewing article needs approximately ...... weeks. If the corresponding author desires a quicker reviewing process, fast-track facility is available with only ....... weeks to complete the reviewing process. The peer review process can be broadly summarized into several steps below. 

  1. Submission of Manuscript

The manuscript is submitted to the journal using our OJS online system. If the corresponfing author are having trouble registering on the OJS, please contact us at sembilanmediapublisher@gmail.com.

  1. Review Process

The reviewer will assess the quality of the article thoroughly and decide whether the article is accepted or rejected. The decision of acceptance or unacceptance will be informed by the reviewer via email. In addition, request for both minor and major revision are required for the accepted articles.

  1. Final Process

After the reviewer receiving the new version of article which has been revised, reviewer will assess and decide whether the article is appropriate or not. Reviewer may give some additional notes to the author if the revision of the article is still not sufficient. If the article has been fulfilled the standard assessment, the reviewer will give the Letter of Acceptance and specify the publish date to the author.

Publication Ethics (based on Elsevier policies)

International Journal of Research on Finance & Business (IJRFB) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Sembilan Media Publisher. IJRFB encompasses all aspects of finance and business topics including Finance, Business, Economics Studies, Management, Accounting, Entrepreneurship, Social Science, etc.

  • Duties of Editors
    • Decision on the Publication of Articles
      The Editor in Chief International Journal of Research on Finance & Business (IJRFB) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The Editor in Chief is guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and subjected to such legal requirements regarding copyright and plagiarism. The Editor in Chief may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this final decision.
    • Fair play
      Manuscripts shall be evaluated solely on their intellectual merit without regard to author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, or citizenship.
    • Confidentiality
      The Editor in Chief and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.
    • Disclosure and conflicts of interest
      Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by anyone who has a view of the manuscript (while handling it) in his or her own research without the express written consent of the author.
  • Duties of Reviewers
    • Contribution to editorial decision
      Peer review assists the Editor in Chief and the editorial board in making editorial decisions while editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
    • Promptness
      Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the assigned manuscript or unable to provide a prompt review should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
    • Confidentiality
      Manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to, or discussed with, others except as authorized by the Editor in Chief. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
    • Standards of Objectivity
      Reviews should be conducted objectively. There shall be no personal criticism of the author. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
    • Acknowledgement of Sources
      Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that had been previously reported elsewhere should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the Editor in Chief/Editorial Board member's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
    • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
      Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  • Duties of Authors
    • Reporting standards
      Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work.
    • Data Access and Retention
      Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such, if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
    • Originality and Plagiarism
      Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others this must be appropriately cited or quoted.
    • Multiple and Concurrent Publications
      An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
    • Acknowledgement of Sources
      Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
    • Authorship of the Paper
      Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
    • Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
      All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
    • Fundamental errors in published works
      When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author's obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.